Imperfectly Famous

David Weinberger had some interesting comments at ROFLcon on the nature of “fame” and Web 2.0. He says, “perfection is the enemy of credibility” from which I’m led to conclude that we ought to be engaged in the pursuit of credibility, not perfection. But I have to say that in the analysis of what is ‘less perfect’ and ‘more credible’, I begin to see a pursuit of what can really only be described as ‘more perfectly imperfect.’ In other words, imperfection is a style toward which many content creators strive. Content is only credible if it’s imperfect in the right way.

via Rocketboom, here’s Weinburger:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

4 Comments so far
Leave a comment

At first, I missed the “rightness” of the imperfection of you mis-spelling Weinberger’s name there at teh end.

[…] love David Weinberger, he’s such an awesome speaker! Thanks to John for pointing out this […]

Alan, I was wondering if anyone was going to catch that. Of course it was you… :)

from this point of view, “repurposing content” is dangerous, because it destroys the original context that makes something appropriately credible and puts it somewhere else where it is more or less credible (by virtue of its new surroundings).



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)