<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Information Experience</title>
	<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/</link>
	<description>A library-geek blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bromberg</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-183853</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bromberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-183853</guid>
		<description>Wow, great post John!

This particular sentence really spoke to me.  I want to frame it! (and wish it were true):

"We’re also more comfortable with the idea of non-authoritative information being valuable, which is a very important distinction because it means we’re willing to let the information itself be the experience."

If by "we" you mean librarians who "get" (heehee) L20, I agree.  If by "we" you mean our profession as  a whole, I'm not so sure.  I think there are large numbers of librarians who would rather go to the backyard and eat dirt then refer a customer (patron, user, client) to a Wikipedia article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great post John!</p>
<p>This particular sentence really spoke to me.  I want to frame it! (and wish it were true):</p>
<p>&#8220;We’re also more comfortable with the idea of non-authoritative information being valuable, which is a very important distinction because it means we’re willing to let the information itself be the experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>If by &#8220;we&#8221; you mean librarians who &#8220;get&#8221; (heehee) L20, I agree.  If by &#8220;we&#8221; you mean our profession as  a whole, I&#8217;m not so sure.  I think there are large numbers of librarians who would rather go to the backyard and eat dirt then refer a customer (patron, user, client) to a Wikipedia article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-166682</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-166682</guid>
		<description>Bonus points to Tombrarian.

KGS: I think we get distracted when we distill the discussion down to tech vs. non-tech--though that is an important component--it's not the end-game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonus points to Tombrarian.</p>
<p>KGS: I think we get distracted when we distill the discussion down to tech vs. non-tech&#8211;though that is an important component&#8211;it&#8217;s not the end-game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.G. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165535</link>
		<dc:creator>K.G. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165535</guid>
		<description>Oh, good post, Mr. B! I loved second-best:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Reading David’s post, I recalled a conversation I had with Stephen Abram quite some time ago where he said he was once asked, "is [so-and-so] Library 2.0-compliant?" Sure, and there is ISO certification for it too. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And first-best? That you stayed away from Books Bad, iPhone Good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, good post, Mr. B! I loved second-best:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reading David’s post, I recalled a conversation I had with Stephen Abram quite some time ago where he said he was once asked, &#8220;is [so-and-so] Library 2.0-compliant?&#8221; Sure, and there is ISO certification for it too. </p></blockquote>
<p>And first-best? That you stayed away from Books Bad, iPhone Good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helene</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165520</link>
		<dc:creator>Helene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165520</guid>
		<description>Damn, I love your writing John.  You always interject a view point that adds both clarity and continuity to the conversation for me. You're right, it's about dialogue, not desention  - Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I love your writing John.  You always interject a view point that adds both clarity and continuity to the conversation for me. You&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s about dialogue, not desention  - Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blyberg.net/2007/08/09/the-information-experience/#comment-165511</guid>
		<description>"Here, at least, was Q.  He could dig his heels in at Q."

Woo-hoo...I get bonus points.  That's probably one of my favorite passages from one of my favorite books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Here, at least, was Q.  He could dig his heels in at Q.&#8221;</p>
<p>Woo-hoo&#8230;I get bonus points.  That&#8217;s probably one of my favorite passages from one of my favorite books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
