<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Wireless for Washtenaw County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blyberg.net/2006/08/07/free-wireless-for-washtenaw-county/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2006/08/07/free-wireless-for-washtenaw-county/</link>
	<description>A library-geek blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>http://www.blyberg.net/2006/08/07/free-wireless-for-washtenaw-county/comment-page-1/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blyberg.net/2006/08/07/free-wireless-for-washtenaw-county/#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>Well, if people want to use their laptops inside, they&#039;ll probably still want to use our wireless.  At a wireless washtenaw meeting, we were told that the service is not guaranteed or intended to provide access inside buildings without the installation of repeaters by the building owner.  We&#039;ll see how the network actually materializes, but it might turn out to be like ann arbor&#039;s sidewalk cafes: really great in the right half of the year.

I also wonder about the service&#039;s ability to be profitable, and I wonder how many subscriptions they have to sell for that to happen.  What happens to the infrastructure if the system fails to turn a profit and the vendor pulls the plug? $35 a month is a lot to pay for a service with a free (but slow) alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if people want to use their laptops inside, they&#8217;ll probably still want to use our wireless.  At a wireless washtenaw meeting, we were told that the service is not guaranteed or intended to provide access inside buildings without the installation of repeaters by the building owner.  We&#8217;ll see how the network actually materializes, but it might turn out to be like ann arbor&#8217;s sidewalk cafes: really great in the right half of the year.</p>
<p>I also wonder about the service&#8217;s ability to be profitable, and I wonder how many subscriptions they have to sell for that to happen.  What happens to the infrastructure if the system fails to turn a profit and the vendor pulls the plug? $35 a month is a lot to pay for a service with a free (but slow) alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
