Comments on: Walt Crawfrord, C&I, Library 2.0 http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/10/walt-crawfrord-ci-library-20/ A library-geek blog Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:06:38 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Library 2.0 Roundup - Redux « Life as I Know It http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/10/walt-crawfrord-ci-library-20/comment-page-1/#comment-175441 Library 2.0 Roundup - Redux « Life as I Know It Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:32:20 +0000 http://www.blyberg.net/?p=65#comment-175441 [...] Walt Crawford, C&I, Library 2.0 - posted on January 10, 2006. [...] [...] Walt Crawford, C&I, Library 2.0 – posted on January 10, 2006. [...]

]]> By: Library 2.0 Roundup « Life as I Know It http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/10/walt-crawfrord-ci-library-20/comment-page-1/#comment-9830 Library 2.0 Roundup « Life as I Know It Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:38:30 +0000 http://www.blyberg.net/?p=65#comment-9830 [...] Walt Crawford, C&I, Library 2.0 - posted on January 10, 2006. [...] [...] Walt Crawford, C&I, Library 2.0 – posted on January 10, 2006. [...]

]]> By: john http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/10/walt-crawfrord-ci-library-20/comment-page-1/#comment-161 john Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:10:48 +0000 http://www.blyberg.net/?p=65#comment-161 Walt, Overall I think you were pretty pragmatic (a very good thing, IMO). I think some of the L2 flap boils down to mis-articulated ideas or viewpoints and misunderstandings. A lot of the argument I've seen simply nibbles around the edge of a shared core vision. Walt,
Overall I think you were pretty pragmatic (a very good thing, IMO). I think some of the L2 flap boils down to mis-articulated ideas or viewpoints and misunderstandings. A lot of the argument I’ve seen simply nibbles around the edge of a shared core vision.

]]> By: walt http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/10/walt-crawfrord-ci-library-20/comment-page-1/#comment-150 walt Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:56:54 +0000 http://www.blyberg.net/?p=65#comment-150 "I doubt Walt meant it to happen, but I believe this latest issue of C&I has served to further legitimize Library 2.0." My intent was to define the landscape, not necessarily objectively, because it was impossible to synthesize. If the result is to legitimize either the concepts (great) or the term (maybe not so great), that's fine with me--since I really shouldn't be and don't intend to be the one making Important Pronouncements in either case. That is: If I say "I really hate the term Library 2.0," given that I'm not in a library and not in a position to either implement or block implementation of the concepts, the appropriate answer really would be, "So what?" So I'm perfectly happy with this response! “I doubt Walt meant it to happen, but I believe this latest issue of C&I has served to further legitimize Library 2.0.”

My intent was to define the landscape, not necessarily objectively, because it was impossible to synthesize. If the result is to legitimize either the concepts (great) or the term (maybe not so great), that’s fine with me–since I really shouldn’t be and don’t intend to be the one making Important Pronouncements in either case.

That is: If I say “I really hate the term Library 2.0,” given that I’m not in a library and not in a position to either implement or block implementation of the concepts, the appropriate answer really would be, “So what?”

So I’m perfectly happy with this response!

]]>